Published on 18th April 2025
“Sadness is inevitable for a large intelligence and a deep heart.” – Fyodor Dostoevsky
But what does that really mean? Dostoevsky didn’t quantify intelligence, nor define what makes a heart “deep.” He merely connected a kind of emotional heaviness with those who think deeply and feel intensely.
Is sadness a defining trait of intelligence? If someone isn’t sad, does it mean they lack intelligence or emotional depth?
From Fyodor’s perspective, maybe sadness isn’t a flaw at all. It could be a natural byproduct of awareness—an emotional tax paid by those who notice more, reflect more, and care more. But that doesn’t mean sadness is bad.
Why do we treat sadness as an unacceptable emotion? Maybe it exists for a reason. Not to oppose happiness, but to balance it. It might help us stay grounded when we’re floating too high.
There’s also the social angle: Do we need to show the world that we’re intelligent? If yes, how? Through traits? Writings? Actions? But if those things reveal intelligence, do they also reveal sadness?
Which leads to a deeper question: What would you choose — intelligence or happiness? Are they even compatible? Or does the pursuit of one push the other away?
Maybe Dostoevsky was misunderstood. Maybe the absence of a smile doesn’t mean sadness. Maybe stillness, seriousness, or quiet aren’t signs of despair but signs of depth — or simply neutrality.
We often rush to interpret expressions, to label moods, to define what intelligence should look like. But maybe there’s a wide emotional spectrum between joy and sorrow that we haven’t fully accepted yet.
Note: Hey readers, these are questions for you guys. If you have the answers, then hit me up! let's discuss it and overcome our sadness.
If you like my articles and want to get notified for new ones, click here